Article 5 by Kristen Simmons. The Bill of Rights has been revoked, and replaced with the Moral Statutes.
There are no more police—instead, there are soldiers. There are no more fines for bad behavior—instead, there are arrests, trials, and maybe worse. People who get arrested usually don't come back.
Seventeen-year-old Ember Miller is old enough to remember that things weren’t always this way. Living with her rebellious single mother, it’s hard for her to forget that people weren’t always arrested for reading the wrong books or staying out after dark. It’s hard to forget that life in the United States used to be different.
Ember has perfected the art of keeping a low profile. She knows how to get the things she needs, like food stamps and hand-me-down clothes, and how to pass the random home inspections by the military. Her life is as close to peaceful as circumstances allow.
That is, until her mother is arrested for noncompliance with Article 5 of the Moral Statutes. And one of the arresting officers is none other than Chase Jennings…the only boy Ember has ever loved.
I hate writing negative reviews, truly I do. However, Article 5 left me feeling incensed. Why? Because it had so much potential to be a really good book. Simmons was actually able to keep drawing me in with her narrative voice, no matter how much I wanted to stop reading. Her writing style is really captivating, but the substance of Article 5 was disappointing.
There weren't enough explanations to back up the dystopian world she created. What was the war all about? Who invaded the US? Did anyone actually invade the US or was it an uprising of ridiculously prude people? Was that why the Bill of Rights were revoked and replaced by Moral Statues? And more importantly... why was there still hot chocolate in a world where you get food stamps???
What frustrated me the most with this book was the main character, Ember. I just felt that there was no real growth in her character throughout the story. She remains childishly selfish for a good 85% of the book. She commits the same mistake twice, in the space of a few days. The first time didn't even have a substantial enough reason behind her actions.
The big twist in the story was also disappointingly, glaringly obvious. If it had been perhaps done differently, it could have worked.
There were also a few similarities to Twilight. Chase, who has Native American blood, is often described as wolf-like. He also used to have longer hair, which he'd cut off shorter since joining the werewolf pack. Oh sorry, I mean, the Moral Militia. There's also a mother that is described as a bit of a useless, but very loving, free-spirit. Also, the seemingly inexplicable love that Chase has for Ember, whom he grew up with. Goodness knows why, because the most Ember ever did for Chase was that she simply sat there and held his hand when he'd lost his parents years before the story commences. Wow. Way to go Bella. I mean, Ember.
In short, I won't be reading the rest of the trilogy.
rating: 1 out of 5 chocolates.